Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spectraforce Technologies Inc
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:11, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Spectraforce Technologies Inc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable company article with no real sources CorporateM (Talk) 18:16, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Fails WP:CORP. Local outsourcing company with no national or international attention. -- ShinmaWa(talk) 19:08, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. HaleAgnes (talk) 20:55, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for now - Indeed it seems they haven't received much attention and Google News only found one recent news article here for a job opening. Google News archives found results here (personal profile for founder Amit Singh), here (detailed article about the company which mentions an Inc. ranking), here (job positions) and here (press release which has been republished, minor mention). I also found an Inc. profile for them here which actually lists three rankings but they aren't significant (the lowest was 182 in 2009 while the others have gotten higher). Another Google News search without the "Inc." provided results here (press release), here, here and here (these last three are all bizjournals.com, the last one is the most detailed). My next and last search was simply "Spectraforce" which provided two more bizjournals.com links (two profiles and one minor mention) and two press releases (for two events in consecutive years). This sounds like a nice company to work for and Inc. says their revenue increased $18 million in three years but aside from the numerous bizjournals.com links, I'm not seeing much notability. I have no prejudice towards a future article, SwisterTwister talk 21:09, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:CORP, not even any local attention. Supplied references are primary sources (press releases) RadioFan (talk) 12:44, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Another IT outsourcing services, and internet marketing company advertising on Wikipedia. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.