Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/State of Bacon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 19:09, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

State of Bacon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film lacking non-trivial support. Fails WP:NOTFILM. reddogsix (talk) 21:42, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It looks to be completed but not yet released.[1] Probably too soon to receive substantial media attention, but the release is just a few weeks away. If this discussion gets relisted, it may indeed end up becoming notable by that time. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:53, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think with some work and rewording it will be a lot better, it seems notable and has enough sources that cover it. NinjaRobotPirate is right, if it's relisted, it'll be notable by that time. LADY LOTUS • TALK 11:51, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and allow editorial improvements over time for this soon-to-release film receiving coverage and passing the cautions of WP:NFF paragraph 3. It's not as if it were unsourcable speculation. Mmmmm Bacon. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 19:39, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HACKSAWJIMDUGGAN. All kidding aside, I can see this getting more press after the premier in May, if it doesn't I would probably vote delete at a second AfD (based on the lack of breadth of the current sources). As it sits now it is a reasonably sourced stub, free of COI (notwithstanding my own, muhahaha!). --kelapstick^(bainuu) 20:22, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.