Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunanda Wong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:55, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sunanda Wong

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero hits at Google News. Fails WP:GNG. Looks like yet another attempt to promote a nobody. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:20, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:53, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:53, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:53, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:53, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Why delete it? User:Lucifero4

@Lucifero4: Because as I clearly indicated in my nomination, the article fails our general notability guideline, which you should be aware of if you edit at Wikipedia and create articles at Wikipedia. You've created 125 articles and have no awareness of a basic community requirement for when an article should be created? Is this a joke? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because I have indicated that argument meets also other criteria.User:Lucifero4

@Lucifero4: You haven't indicated anything or made any argument. You !voted and asked a question. If your "keep" !vote is meaningful to you, you will support it with guidelines or policy-based reasons, like I and the others have done, otherwise the person closing the discussion will disregard it. Also, if you choose to participate in discussions, please type four tildes after your name like ~~~~. This will properly append your signature and a timestamp to your posts. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:40, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteNot seeing how they meet notability. They've won a game show and hosted a couple of other small shows. Sources aren't there - an interview (doesn't help notability), a passing mention (doesn't help notability), article about winning the show (helps, but also supports a redirect to the show) and another article with a passing mention. Ravensfire (talk) 03:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Draft:Sunanda Wong was declined at AFC on 18 November 2018 and had not been improved since then so I was surprised to see it moved to article space. This might possibly have been because I had nominated Sunanda Wong for deletion after Bhanwar singh vaish created it as a copy and past move of the draft, making several errors in the process. I agree that the subject does not seem to meet WP:GNG so I see no reason for the article to be kept, even as a draft. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG. WP:TOOSOON. Qualitist (talk) 19:25, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.