Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TRACE International

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:08, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TRACE International

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability guidelines and seems promotional. The only sources offered seem to be press releases/announcements and associated sources. 331dot (talk) 17:17, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:07, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per this essay and the lack of any reliable sources in the article.Burning Pillar (talk) 22:42, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Burning Pillar, Please stop citing an essay that you wrote yourself as a reason for deletion. You have a clear conflict of interest and this behavior looks a lot like spamming. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On the article talk page, the page creator(who has a COI) has consented to the article being moved to draft space for submission as a Draft or through AfC. 331dot (talk) 21:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this product brochure, please. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:48, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. I've removed most of the article as it was unabashed marketing spam. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 17:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence of notability. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.