Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tallulah (singer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Strong keep consensus. Additionally no clearly valid deletion criteria was cited by the OP. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:10, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tallulah (singer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We'd like this Wikipedia page deleted as the information is not correct, and the artist is in the process of re branding. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amymills (talk • contribs) 15:35, June 15, 2017 (UTC)

Comment Nominator is a new account with no edits other than to this topic. Discussion page was created without the afd2 template and not transcluded to a daily log page. I have completed the nomination as a courtesy, but no policy-based reason for deletion has been offered here. If the subject is changing her stage name, and this change is well-documented, then the page can simply be moved. --Finngall ^talk 16:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also discussion with nominator on my talk page. --Finngall ^talk 18:12, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep as the nominator's concern can be easily remedied through editing and/or moving the article. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 17:28, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:43, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:43, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Sources to meet WP:GNG and even WP:MUSICBIO are lacking. No need to move the article. It would be nice to know how far the "rebranding" of the artist has gone and who Amy Mills is in relation to the subject. And since sources are lacking for this subject, I suspect that sources for the rebranded subject would be similarly lacking and so I would advise the editor not to even try to create an article for the singer until GNG is met. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Subject was formerly known as Syron and there are some sources for the subject under that name. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:05, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Walter Görlitz: Amymills has stated on my talk page that she is "from the artists team". --Finngall ^talk 22:07, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - I just read that. Thanks. COI. I'm OK with Move to the correct location, but there's no way that we are allowing the team to dictate what does and does not go into the article. Right now, without good sources, most of the content (notably genres) are unsourced and ready to be deleted. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:48, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article could be edited or moved, and I'm uncomfortable taking direction for the subject's marketing team. - GretLomborg (talk) 18:14, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.