Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamás Eszes (politician)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. The consensus below is that the coverage is sufficient to justify an article. Eluchil404 (talk) 06:08, 19 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Tamás Eszes (politician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable person (and he was never a politician). Crufjsa (talk) 11:54, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Politician "includes people who hold decision-making positions in government, and people who seek those positions". That definition certainly embraces Eszes. WWGB (talk) 12:32, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – He was a mayoral candidate in 2011. His death was reported in the English-language press. Norden (talk) 15:21, 11 November 2011 (CET)
- Keep. The subject of the article has attracted international media attention in at least the United States [1], Canada [2], United Kingdom [3], Ireland [4] and India [5]. He clearly satisfies WP:SIGCOV. WWGB (talk) 15:16, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WWGB. GNews shows substantial coverage of the subject [6] and his death [7]. (adding signature later) Arxiloxos (talk) 15:45, 11 November 2011. Oops! Forgot to sign this at the time I posted it. Sorry. Arxiloxos (talk) 00:50, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:55, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – Topic passes WP:GNG, a couple of links I added to the article:
- "Hungarian Roma Flee From Far-Right Group". Sky News. April 23, 2011. Retrieved November 11, 2011.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|publisher=
- McLaughlin, Daniel (April 28, 2011). "Hungary promises to tackle far-right vigilantes after four hurt in clashes". Irish Times. Retrieved November 11, 2011.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in:|publisher=
|publisher=
(help)
- "Hungarian Roma Flee From Far-Right Group". Sky News. April 23, 2011. Retrieved November 11, 2011.
- —Northamerica1000(talk) 00:31, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Hungarian National Defence Association. While I suppose it's possible that he was covered extensively in the Hungarian press prior to the incident this year, it seems quite unlikely, given there is no Hungarian wikipedia article on the man. He received international attention only due to the paramilitary training episode this year. Nevard (talk) 01:00, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There was an article about him in the Hungarian Wikipedia, hu:Eszes Tamás (remember that Maygar names are Familyname Givenname, not Givenname Familyname), but it was deleted a few days ago with a rationale linking to the Hungarian equivalent of WP:NOT. Nyttend (talk) 23:02, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There wasn't an article about him in the Hungarian Wikipedia, a meaningless text was on the place of the article, and it was deleted because of this. Crufjsa (talk) 13:14, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Inline citations show good coverage in the international press. --DThomsen8 (talk) 11:14, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I agree, the coverage in the international press proves he is notable. Dream Focus 12:06, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.