Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tammy Cromer-Campbell
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was move to draft namespace. The nominator has essentially withdrawn, agreeing to a move of the article to Draft namespace. North America1000 10:47, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
- Tammy Cromer-Campbell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOUR. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:26, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:11, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:11, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for now and draft to userspace - My searches here, here, here and here found results but not enough for solid notability. This is a nice, neat and sourced article but I think we can wait until she's achieved some more coverage. SwisterTwister talk 04:27, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- Whose userspace would we move it to? The creator is indeffed blocked as part of a PR sockfarm. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:03, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware of that; in that case any willing or future user. I simply thought of drafting since the article may have future potential. SwisterTwister talk 20:47, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- I guess moving it to Draft:Tammy Cromer-Campbell would be okay, that gives it 6 months for someone to decide to work on it before it becomes a stale draft. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.