Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tele-evidence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Deposition (law). Appropriate content can be merged from the history. Sandstein 16:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tele-evidence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge with deposition (law), as the article works better with the merge. As it stands, the article does not work well in a separate article. Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 01:11, 9 May 2017 (UTC) Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 01:11, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi everyone

My name is Mahesh and I am the creator of wikipedia page Tele-evidence. Being new to wikipedia I faced initial challenges of working with wiki (like adding links, references, pics etc) but with the help and guidance of others on wikipedia I could create a small page with some data, references and pics. I am a working professional and not very tech savvy, so can devote a very limited time to build the page further but I am doing my best and hope more people will chip in coming days as the concept expands.

However since the creation of this page, Kiteinthewind is suggesting to merge it with deposition. His/her argument is that it's one and same but is being done electronically in case of Tele-evidence.

I'll explain as to how it is different in coming days. Please bear with me. Thanks

Hospadmnpgi (talk) 05:49, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, being new I might not be getting what exactly 'merger' of Tele-evidence with Deposition means. Could you please explain it. Thanks Hospadmnpgi (talk) 05:54, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to Hospadmnpgi - Tele-evidence is merely a deposition by electronic means, in which the underlying fundamentals is the same as deposition. We are confusing means with end here. As for a merger, it means that relevant articles in this article will be incorporated with deposition (law), and the Tele-evidence page will be redirected to that page. This is different from a delete, in that when an article is deleted, the article, and all of its contents, are completely removed from Wikipedia. Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 17:45, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. Much of this article appears as if it is a vehicle to promote the Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research. The use of the tele-evidence arrangements have been reported in a small geographical area, although it does look as if the use of these arrangements will expand across India. I don't think there has currently been enough done to establish notability to a point where it could stand as an article on its own. Drchriswilliams (talk) 00:48, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; Oppose merge with Deposition (law) -- never heard of this in my law classes. Send this to WP:AfC before it shows up again. --David Tornheim (talk) 13:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- BTW, WP:IDONTKNOWIT is generally not considered to be a sound and convincing argument. Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 04:42, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^(c)}} 20:05, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into another article. Digital/electronic methods in civil procedure is already covered in the deposition article. It should be merged into Civil Procedure Code, 1908, if anything. If videoconferencing has little or no relation to that law, then that article should be moved to Indian civil procedure law after merging, to match other articles (see law of India.) It is a detail of deposition methods as used in Indian civil procedure. int21h (talk · contribs · email) 20:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.