Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thailand–Vietnam football rivalry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 17:30, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thailand–Vietnam football rivalry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See this very similar AfD. I can't find much to support the existence of this rivalry, let alone its notability. See WP:NRIVALRY; rivalries are not inherently notable and GNG needs to be met. In this case, it doesn't appear to be met. Spiderone 19:47, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 19:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 20:00, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom, rivalries are not inherently notable. With the only source provided being "all time results" this seems like it could potentially fall under WP:OR as well. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 21:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – As per nom and previous discussion. Molecule Extraction (talk) 03:49, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NRIVALRY, no evidence of GNG. Simply because two teams play each other regularly does not create a de facto rivalry. Even if there is a rivalry, it has to be demonstrated that this has received significant, reliable coverage as a notion in itself, not simply the synthesis of a series of match reports. Fenix down (talk) 15:58, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.