Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Crimson House (2013 Film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Go Phightins! 01:24, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Crimson House (2013 Film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, does not have significant third-party coverage, does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 19:43, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We do also have the Theatrical Poster awaiting approval for upload as well as a Clear Channel owned advertisement and a news publication. What other items can we submit to better assist?JuggaletteJen216 (talk) 20:06, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment indicates that you may have a conflict of interest. Also, in response to what you asked, you might want to read Wikipedia:No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. G S Palmer (talk) 20:46, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- You may also want to read our guide for editors with a conflict of interest. G S Palmer (talk) 21:07, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now, but without prejudice to recreation if it gains enough coverage to pass notability guidelines. This just doesn't pass notability guidelines at this point in time. I'll leave a more detailed note on the editor's page explaining NFILM in more detail. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:16, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*Redirect to Lemi Ponifasio per sources [1] and [2] stating he is the director. It's a cheap fix that if the short film becomes something later that reaches WP:NFILM standards then it can be redone. LADY LOTUS • TALK 11:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong film. Wrong country. Sorry. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 12:45, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

story/director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

actress:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

actor:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

actress:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

actor:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

studio:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

screenwriter:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete without prejudice. Not completely unsourcable. The film premieres on Thursday the 29th.[3][4] If it gets the requisite coverage to meet WP:NF it can come back... and what might then be undeleted, is just a tad better than what was written by its inexperienced contributor. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 12:42, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with the option of re-creation if it gains notability. G S Palmer (talk) 15:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.