Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fallen: 2012
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:41, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The Fallen: 2012 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Other than the single reference in the article, I cannot find this film's existance online. The single reference being used is trivial in passing, and is used throughout the article to give it undue weight (the reference is about a birth of a white buffalo which is how I found this page). This film is not even listed in the IMDB. The author's only edits are to the article, and adding the article to a list of other 2012 doomsday prophecy films. And this in particular just appears to be an indie film trying to cash in on the 2012 phenomenon.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 13:14, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If it isn't even notable enough to fit on IMDB then it really fails the WP:Notable test now, doesn't it?--WngLdr34 (talk) 13:38, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I agree with WngLdr34, if this "movie" doesn't make IMDB it in most called fails for notability. --mwilso24 (Talk/Contrib) 18:25, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:23, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this film. Joe Chill (talk) 21:41, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as currently unsupportable. No information exists yet in reliable sources. The production company itself only has a myspace page [1] and a Linkedin profile [2] where they refer to themselves as "up and coming". Not enough... way not enough. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 23:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 22:58, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.