Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gaztetxe of Vitoria-Gasteiz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (soft) slakr^\ talk / 00:32, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Gaztetxe of Vitoria-Gasteiz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a giant advertisement, even contains email addresses for contacts, now this could be a very interesting article if done correctly. Wgolf (talk) 18:01, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment (leaning delete) - WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. The fact that an article reads like an advertisement is not relevant at AfD, because it can be cleaned up with editing. What is relevant is whether or not we are able to clean the article, particularly through adding reliable sources. To do this, we have to look at the availability of reliable sources--the notability of the subject. So far, I'm not seeing any such sources jumping out at me. It looks like the Spanish name for this is "Gaztetxe de Vitoria-Gasteiz". That may be helpful for finding sources. Mz7 (talk) 14:56, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:05, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 03:42, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.