Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The History of Truth
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 02:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The History of Truth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Unsourced crystal ball article about a film with no distributor, no director and no cast, because the producer "has keept every single detail of the film in secret". Possible hoax, too - the sole external link is to a website which has nothing to do with this alleged film other than having "History" and "Truth" in its name. Stormie (talk) 03:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 03:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this information, leave a redirect to W. H. Auden (as a title of one of his poems.--Alf melmac 09:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Alf. Bláthnaid 12:21, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as crystal-balling. If and when the movie is released, try making an article then, with solid facts. 1ForTheMoney (talk) 14:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Doctorfluffy (talk) 18:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Snowball delete per nom. --AndrewHowse (talk) 14:33, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete pure speculation (WP:NOR) no sources WP:V — BQZip01 — talk 05:03, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.