Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theory of supreme relativity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per criterion G1: patent nonsense. RockMagnetist (talk) 19:45, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2013 April 8.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

Theory of supreme relativity

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't know a lot of physics, but I do know that an article about a theory that has no book hits whatsoever, and is sourced to a single document, is probably original research and does not meet the notability guidelines for inclusion. No prejudice to withdrawing this AFD if someone can provide evidence to the contrary. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:05, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No sign of notability. No reliable sources given, nothing found on Google or WoK under this title. The article doesn't make any actual statement that could be used to find sources on the concept independent of the title. — HHHIPPO 17:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.