Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thukalamkuzhiyil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:41, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thukalamkuzhiyil

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. A local family with no evidence of notability Salih (talk) 12:51, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is really a local issue here, and it should be deleted for Notability. --WngLdr34 (talk) 13:29, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 14:06, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a local family with no real notability. This is part of a series of such articles, many of which have been deleted by PROD and AfD over the past month. -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 14:07, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Would need sources to have any chance; I can't find any. --Milowent (talk) 14:16, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability. Edison (talk) 16:48, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no existance reason. Geschichte (talk) 20:28, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete could potentially be notable if there were reliable sources, but there don't seem to be any. Bfigura ^(talk) 21:01, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - according to my Internet searches, there is no evidence this surname even exists. Bearian (talk) 17:52, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.