Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tita Datu Puangco
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:39, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tita Datu Puangco (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:BIO , blatant self promotional piece with the only reference being a self published source. hardly anything in gnews [1]. LibStar (talk) 00:08, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is a CV. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 03:42, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not finding adequate sourcing in Google, Google News or Google Books--I doubt it exists. (Subject is not to be confused with "Klaatu barada nikto"). JohnWBarber (talk) 04:30, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm not sure why this would be confused with Klaatu barada nikto, but the article is promotional with inadequate sources. JUJUTACULAR | TALK 15:48, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Not enough to establish importance. GlassCobra 15:49, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 18:46, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —Bluemask (talk) 07:28, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.