Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Todd Hosmer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Todd Hosmer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 08:06, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:08, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:08, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:08, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:08, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: NN journeyman in the low minors, could never pass any iteration of WP:NHOCKEY, let alone the current one, fails the GNG. One of the classic WP:DOLOVISCREATEDIT riffs of claiming that an "all-star" in the lowest North American semi-pro leagues meets notability standards, but that's like saying that the MVP of your hometown's Little League does. Ravenswing 20:33, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per Ravenswing. Found some coverage on a recent trade he was involved in but not enough to pass GNG. Rlendog (talk) 14:42, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.