Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tournament of Minds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 08:40, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tournament of Minds

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. A google search reveals little information on this tournament besides its own social media outlets. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 09:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:51, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:51, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:51, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 09:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This is a very long standing competition - I took part in it in 1991 or 1992. A search of the National Library of Australia's Trove service returns 115 results [1], so this is highly likely to be notable. Nick-D (talk) 10:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Easily notable, long running competition and there are lots of sources available in an online search.--Mvqr (talk) 12:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the article desperately needs attention but a quick Google News search reveals that it's clearly notable and shouldn't be deleted Spiderone 14:24, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sufficient items found to turn this into an adequate article and meet notability requirements. The article is a present sub-standard. NealeFamily (talk) 09:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.