Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tribetoy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tribetoy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pretty much no references that would fulfill WP:NCORP. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:54, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There doesn't appear to be any depth of coverage (WP:CORPDEPTH) to establish notability and justify a Wikipedia article. Slideshow Bob (talk) 12:07, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 12:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails NCORP/CORPDEPTH per nom. The only sources I find are casual mentions in relation to their product, the video game Chu's Dynasty. Note that both articles were created by "Trueping". Tara Rueping is listed as a key person on the corp article. -- ferret (talk) 12:21, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SPIP, no indications of notability. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 11:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.