Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UKeiG
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 04:58, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
- UKeiG (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Two brief mentions on News. Zip on Newspapers. Books returned the best about the group, but all the hits were either brief mentions or listings of the organization (with description obviously written by the organization itself). Scholar only has mentions of them, nothing in-depth, and same with Highbeam. Onel5969 TT me 23:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 01:11, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:49, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:49, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for now as I simply see nothing better. Notifying taggers Benlisquare and Ntb613. SwisterTwister talk 07:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - no in depth coverage of the subject and the existing mentions are trivial and (or) not coverage. Fails GNG, delete.—UY Scuti Talk 14:38, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.