Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Hudgens Second Studio Album

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, without prejudice to re-creation under proper name after album is released, if it is released, and is sufficiently verifiable and notable for inclusion. --MCB (talk) 07:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vanessa Hudgens Second Studio Album

No reliable source, no title, no release date ... WP:CRYSTAL violation. Kww (talk) 02:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whisper (Vanessa Hudgens Album) for same album, different name.--NrDg 16:43, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's all based on a dodgy self-published source, cannot find any other mention of this anywhere. --neonwhite user page talk 02:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, crystal-ballism at its worst. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per WP:CRYSTAL. Gromlakh (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not much is known about the album and I think that this material should be recreated when more information is announced (the title,release date,etc...) Surfer-Boy94 (talk) 7:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Comment: www.dotspotter.com does not satisfy WP:RS.Kww (talk) 13:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Surfer-boy94 (talk · contribs) is the article creator. Can't speedy under {{db-author}} as others have made significant contributions. --NrDg 14:35, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same person suspected: Note: comments indicating this were deleted by anonymous vandal Kww (talk) 16:46, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The Vanessa Hudgens Second Studio Album article is fully sourced, with a source for the release date, confirmed tracks and that she is working on a new album. Piece-of-Me-08 (talk) 06:13 , 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Comment: Account created immediately before this vote, and this vote is its only contribution. Account created within 10 minutes of creation of Insomniatic_999. www.dotspotter.com does not satisfy WP:RS.Kww (talk) 13:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Everything is fully sourced in this article, and Vanessa has said many times that she is working on a new album set for a May/June 2008 release. Insomniatic_999 (talk) 06:18 , 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Comment: Account created immediately before this vote, and this vote is its only contribution. Account created within 10 minutes of creation of Piece-of-Me-08. www.dotspotter.com does not satisfy WP:RS.Kww (talk) 13:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Vanessa Hudgens is working on a new album (she has even stated it herself) and this article is fully sourced. Motion-In-The-Ocean (talk) 06:26 , 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Comment: www.dotspotter.com does not satisfy WP:RS.Kww (talk) 13:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - As confirmed by Vanessa herself, a new album is in the works and this article is fully sourced. Girls alouds biggest fan (talk) 07:28 , 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Comment: www.dotspotter.com does not satisfy WP:RS.Kww (talk) 13:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I'm getting deja vu here. Wasn't this article on AFD just a few days ago, or is this a separate article on the same subject? 23skidoo (talk) 16:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Just to confirm the source is wholey self-published with no evidence of editorial oversight therefore it fails WP:V and can not be used. --neonwhite user page talk 18:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Eonline - Vanessa Hudgens' Sophomore Effort supports the probable release of a second album. This is mentioned and referenced in the Vanessa Anne Hudgens article. The use of unnamed sources in the article reduces the cites usefulness in my opinion though, so the support is very weak as we have no way of verifying the reliable of the source they used. --NrDg 19:14, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and editor's very long history of creating unsourced articles just like this one. - eo (talk) 01:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There are many sources that confirm that Hudgens is working on a new album due for release this Summer and also for the tracks listed - Exclusive_474 02:51, 23 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Exclusive 474 (talk • contribs)
- Comment - Going over the references that were added to the article it looks like they are all sourced by either the Eonline article or are comments in blogs by unknown authors so have no reputation for fact checking. --NrDg 14:39, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I have to agree with the above, at this time the article does not source reliable sources as established by WP:RS and as such it qualifies for WP:BALL. SorryGuy Talk 23:50, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

--MCB (talk) 07:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]