Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vientiane Metro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vientiane Metro

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

CSD tagged as hoax, but created by a reputable looking editor. Yet I can find no evidence for this future transit system and none is given. Peridon (talk) 10:38, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE- I found so many unreliable references. So IMHO it is not a hoax, at least. But fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:RS. So delete. -- Bharathiya (talk) 11:34, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Virtually everything I found was a mirror, or referred to the bus system. Peridon (talk) 12:40, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:50, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now - Considering that the article cites 2013 and 2020 as the opening dates, there is little content to build an article with this. I haven't found any relevant sources with "Vientiane Metro Laos" so it is likely that any reliable sources would be local thus Lao language. If any Lao sources exist, I suggest that the article is transferred to Lao Wikipedia. SwisterTwister talk 20:17, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.