Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual Team Maturity Model (VTMM)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:33, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual Team Maturity Model (VTMM)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable business process. Was published as a doctoral thesis by Dr. Ralf Friedrich, but has received very few citations. It is being commercialized by a very small company (micro company according to this) which would be A7able, but the article is on the process. This does not meet GNG.

Noting this was created with a tag this was accepted at AfC, yet I don't quite see where that happened if at all (The Draft:Virtual Team Maturity Model appears unreviewed, and this would see to be a copy paste move by the creator with the AfC acceptance tag). Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 14:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 14:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 14:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per WP:G11. JBchrch talk 14:23, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to User:Eostrix - The tag that you are commenting on is wrong. It means that there is an AFC submission template in a page that is in article space. This can happen, as the display says, if the draft was accepted, but the AFC script did not complete. As you noted, this more often means that there was either a copy-paste move or an actual Move. The draft may even have been declined in AFC. The article should be reviewed, and usually cannot be moved to draft space because there is already a draft. The article often needs to be taken to AFD, as this one was. The tag is wrong. A few reviewers have been complaining about the wording of the tag for years, and no one seems to care about the incorrect tag. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable business process model. As noted by nominator, developed as a Ph.D. thesis that has not been cited much since. Reads like an abstract of the thesis describing the model. Was first submitted to Articles for Creation in draft. When the draft was not reviewed quickly (and AFC is still backlogged), it was then copy-pasted into article space, which can either indicate an attempt to game the system or impatience with the review process. The latter, impatience, is the good-faith explanation; the draft, which is the same as this article, would have been declined. Originator may be a single-purpose account publicizing the business process model, whether due to a conflict of interest or otherwise. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Bordering on WP:G11/WP:A7 territory. Best, GPL93 (talk) 01:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.