Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Ji'en (Liao Dynasty eunuch)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 02:55, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wang Ji'en (Liao Dynasty eunuch)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a fork of Empress Xiao Yanyan, created by a sockpuppet (see user:Khan zor and user:Jehoys) obsessed with the apparent mass castration conducted by Empress Xiao Yanyan. The article doesn't focus on Wang Ji'en at all, so much as that it provides another vehicle for this person to talk about the mass castration. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:37, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm not convinced of the topic's notability. The information about the topic is unverifiable or cited to iffy sites, seemingly derived from a sparse mention in a primary source. The secondary cited things isn't about the topic. --Cold Season (talk) 19:38, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:19, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, agree with analysis by Cold Season (talk · contribs), above, particularly with regard to the secondary sources, or lack thereof. Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 04:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, Cirt, WP:SOAP, and WP:OR. This is almost entirely a cut and paste of an original source, complete with pinyan, and very little dressing. We are not a soapbox. Bearian (talk) 17:41, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.