Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Potomac Rugby Football Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

West Potomac Rugby Football Club

Contested CSD Keilana^talk_(recall) 23:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a valid deletion reason. MECU≈talk 23:49, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The implication is that Keilana has denied the CSD tagging, and is bringing it up for community discussion. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 04:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The entry has been expanded to include more information about the organization's history with external references/press mentions. The entry is now as -- if not more -- complete than many of the wikipedia entries for West Potomac's peer teams. If this article is still considered a potential AfD, please indicate specific reasons why this entry is not appropriate compared to the others in the US rugby union teams category. Bobby sparkles (talk) 02:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I'm not into sports, etc. articles, but I don't see how an article with all those references from all those different independent sources, including the Washington Post, could fail a notability test. Nyttend (talk) 02:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Nyttend. I had tagged this as A7, which at the time it absolutely was. However, the effort put into this article has been exemplary and a gold standard on how to save an article. Good work.--CastAStone /^/(talk) 04:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure about this idea, but given Keilana's method of starting this AfD, my response may qualify the article for Speedy Keep per nom.--CastAStone /^/(talk) 04:51, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- How does one contest a speedy? Mostlyharmless (talk) 08:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With a hangon template if you're the creator of the article, or by removing the speedy deletion template if you're not. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.