Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women2WinWales (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Women2Win. Merge consensus agreed per participants and nominator. (non-admin closure) AmericanAir88(talk) 03:14, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Women2WinWales (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While Women2Win may be notable despite being a redlink, I don't think the same can be said about its Welsh arm. I wasn't able to find any substantial sources about it. It was originally kept in 2007, largely on the strength of "well it must be notable because someone notable chaired it" arguments, which don't hold up under our more stringent modern standards. I'm not sure a redirect to Cheryl Gillan is suitable, as the organization isn't mentioned in her article. I couldn't find an independent source reporting about her chairing it, so I'm not sure it's even worth a merge there. In the absence of any major sources or reasonable redirect targets, we can't keep this. ♠PMC(talk) 03:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC(talk) 03:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC(talk) 03:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC(talk) 03:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC(talk) 03:03, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As nom I'm fine with that. ♠PMC(talk) 00:54, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also in support of a merge. Thank you for creating the page. — Bilorv (talk) 08:19, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.