Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wuthering Heights (band)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. J04n(talk page) 10:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Wuthering Heights (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
article deleted via expired prod but now restored. Taking to afd to for larger consensus. Curb Chain (talk) 23:51, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Six reliable sources were added post-restoration so i am baffled by this make-work. 86.42.94.218 (talk) 03:43, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sufficient coverage to establish notability, and album releases on labels that appear to pass criterion 5 of WP:BAND. --Michig (talk) 06:10, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There appears to be enough coverage to meet WP:GNG and WP:BAND #1. Gong show 07:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salt (Wuthering Heights album) still pending. postdlf (talk) 04:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.