Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xevoz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:58, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Xevoz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Very not notable. I've trimmed the cruft already, and then found nothing underneath. See, for instance, this and this. Also, this--there are no reliable sources for this toy. Drmies (talk) 20:01, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:42, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 00:20, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, completely lacking in sources. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:25, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.