Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zip Us In

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:17, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zip Us In

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage in reliable sources, does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NCORP. Provided sources are all in tabloids, blogs, or otherwise unreliable or trivial coverage. I was unable to find anything better online, although I was able to find even more tabloid coverage. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:20, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:22, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:01, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 15:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The Southern Daily Echo is a reliable source; I'm not sure about Chat (magazine). These are more than trivial but not very substantial. Peter James (talk) 09:43, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While some of the sources are reliable, I don’t think there’s enough to reach the ‘significant’ threshold for GNG. Probably one of the best sources, the Southern Echo one, is really more about the person being honored than the clothing line, for instance. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 19:31, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.