Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Tbilisi

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2011 at 00:53:35 (UTC)

Support as nominator --Jujutacular ^talk 00:53, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Would be more worthwhile if the picture caption in article described which mountains or hills we are seeing, or the orientation of the shot. (Is a lot of discussions of different surrounding mountains in that Geo section.) Also, as used now, there is a text squeeze going on. Suggest to display centered and a bit wider, above or below that section.TCO (reviews needed) 02:37, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support The geocoding helps. JJ Harrison (talk) 07:31, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great overview of the city, its topography and architecture. I moved it to the infobox, where I think it does a better job than in the geography section. --Elekhh (talk) 21:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not every high resolution panorama is automatically a FP. This picture is, to be honest, boring. Composition is really bad, and the lighting is dull. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 07:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and agree with Aaadddaaammm. Pine _{(was GreenPine)} ^talk 19:44, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunate sky. It really draws attention away from the point of the work. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:19, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]