Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 June 3

< June 2	June 4 >

June 3

File:Dominosparrow.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free photograph of a sparrow that was involved in a (semi-)notable incident we have an article about. Has a boilerplate FUR talking about "a significant photo of a famous animal". Fails NFCC#8, for the simple reason that all sparrows look the same. Seeing a photograph of this individual doesn't help the reader understand the article any more than seeing a photograph of any other sparrow would, or indeed seeing no photograph at all. The habit of having "portrait" photos of animals makes sense only for species that have at least some degree of human-recognizable individualized traits, such as dogs. Sparrows just don't have that. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:31, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"It is a significant photo of a famous animal." - how this photo is significant? Bulwersator (talk) 10:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2K - FTM.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by MGA73 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tagges with "Do not copy this file to Wikimedia Commons." but was kept on Commons. Please delete as F8. Bulwersator (talk) 10:23, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unger Lula.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn - found the correct source (http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/sites/_agenciabrasil/files/gallery_assist/3/gallery_assist638709/prev/1705fp701.jpg) on a page where the cc-by licence is clearly stated. Thanks Fut.Perf - Peripitus (Talk) 12:11, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image used to show two men talking - this in no way significantly increases reader's understanding of the topic and fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 10:32, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image accompanies the article on philosopher Roberto Mangabeira Unger. It is an image of Unger speaking intimately and intensely with Brazilian president Lula. The image is necessary to the article in order illustrate the Unger's political influence and connection with Lula. Although this is stated in the text in so many words, the picture significantly increases the reader's understanding of exactly the closeness of that relationship and how Unger was able to push his influence. The picture further shows the intensity with which Unger took to projecting his philosophical project to the level of politics. In this way, the picture meets NFCC#8. Without this picture, the reader would not have a sense of the man or his political influence. Archivingcontext (talk) 11:05, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This photograph comes from Agência Brasil, a commercial news agency, which however has released much of its material under CC-BY-SA (see commons:Template:Agência Brasil). Keep iff it can be verified that this is under a free license. Delete otherwise, per the original nominator's NFC argumentation, and per WP:CSD#F7b. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:10, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ABr under free license here http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Photographs_by_Agencia_Brasil#U. The necessary template has been added. Archivingcontext (talk) 11:21, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unger medal.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: closed, per consensus, turns out to be freely licensed. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:36, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image used to show a man got an important honor. Does not significantly increase reader's understanding - fails NFCC#8 - and appears to be a press image which may be a NFCC#2 failure. Peripitus (Talk) 10:34, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This picture illustrates the philosopher Roberto Mangabeira Unger receiving a medal of honor from the Brazilian president for his service to the Brazilian state in formulating a defense strategy. It is necessary in order to illustrate the influence of this thinker. It shows that this honor bestowed upon him was not just a letter mailed or invitation for a speech given, but rather a formal state ceremony where no one less than the president of Brazil himself bestowed Unger with this honor. All this is more than can be expressed in the text itself. In this way it meets NFCC#8 criteria. As for NFCC#2, as stated in the original justification, this image has served its commercial purpose and is no longer a commercially viable or necessary product. In the language of the policy, it does not "replace the original market role of the original copyrighted media." Archivingcontext (talk) 11:11, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Conditional keep if free, as per the next nomination above, otherwise delete per nom as NFCC#8 and #2 failure. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:13, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ABr under free license here http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Photographs_by_Agencia_Brasil#U. The necessary template has been added. Archivingcontext (talk) 11:21, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In this case I cannot find the source - how do you know it's from their website and so listed as freely licenced ? Peripitus (Talk) 12:17, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Found here: http://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/galeria/2008-04-18/18-de-abril-de-2008#. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:28, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Satyadev dubey.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

press image of a widely photographed, recently deceased, actor/director. Image is sourced to a press site (which may be an NFCC#2 issue) and is of a person where I can see a great many images. Claiming it is irreplaceable when there are so many available, and not all online, is hardly supportable as it seems likely a freely licensed image could be found. At the least we shouldn't just nick commercial press images. Peripitus (Talk) 10:43, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tryper-75S.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

random non-free screen shot with no real rationale for use - fails NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 10:52, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tranzor form.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

random non-free screen shot with no real rationale for use - fails NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 10:53, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daimos Commercial Banner.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

random non-free screen shot with no real rationale for use - fails NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 10:55, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:San marino cable car view.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There was a big discussion a few months ago about what to do with works from countries that have no copyright relations with the US, and which may therefore count as PD in the US. The discussion (at Wikipedia talk:Copyrights) was closed as "no consensus", with the recommendation to continue the practice of disallowing such items. Here now, we have what may be the first test case from one such country that I must admit I never knew was part of this group: San Marino. Given the previous discussion, I think it is not worth re-opening this can of worms, especially not for the sake of such a tiny, blurry, low-quality screenshot, of a rather generic panorama view, of which free and better replacements could very easily be taken, especially when far superior photographs of quite similar panoramas already exist on Commons (e.g. File:San Marino 010.jpg, showing the same town from the same hill, taken from a point just a few hundred meters away, or File:San-Marino-Gondola-1283.jpg, showing the same cable car). Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:17, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Was the decision to delete the files, or to use the updated tags saying the items are copyright-free in the US as they have no copyright relations with the US? I read the discussion, and it's no clearer on the discussion page then before.... Oaktree b (talk) 20:38, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The way I read the closing admin's statement (at the top of the discussion), he was saying that there was neither a consensus for maintaining the status quo ante, nor a consensus for any of the proposed new rules, but that his conclusion was "sticking with the status quo ante" in the absence for a consensus to change. the "status quo ante" was the old rule of not using such items, as decreed several years ago by Jimbo. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:56, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At Future Perfect's request, I'm here to clarify my closure of the RFC. Oaktree, you are right that in relation to Finding 3 in my conclusion, on the country-specific PD tags, is a bit unclear. I think my followup on the same page helps clarify that, but you may not have seen it. The country-specific tags like User:Buffs/PD-San Marino in US should be used and applied as appropriate, but updated to indicate that a Fair Use Rationale is required in addition to the tag (with an explanation that refers to the policy). But the text of Wikipedia:Non-U.S._copyrights#Countries_without_copyright_relations_with_the_United_States (which I've just updated) should also be borne in mind; if the incorporated work is not free in Country X, that inhibits the ability to reproduce the relevant Wikipedia article(s) in Country X. Fair Use guidelines cover that pretty well - if an image meets those, then that should be justification enough to use content copyrighted in Country X, even if Country X doesn't have applicable Fair Use provisions. Rd232 ^talk 21:47, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is by the way not the first case since the closure of that RfC; I proposed a few Iranian files for deletion some time ago. The conclusion was that photos such as this one should be treated as unfree, and this photo fails WP:NFCC#1. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:48, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rhumart MBI 3000 RESC Controller.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by MGA73 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing copyrighted in this image making fair use tags necessary. The larger scale version of this has been moved to Commons. This does not qualify for speedy deletion because it is not pixel identical to the Commons version. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 17:49, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2.7.07JoeQuesada2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused crop of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2.7.07JoeQuesada2.jpg and unlikely to be used due to extremely low quality Bulwersator (talk) 18:19, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. --MGA73 (talk) 11:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AntiEP.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious PD-shape, please delete as F8 Bulwersator (talk) 18:30, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. --MGA73 (talk) 11:06, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Associació Guiatge Valenciá.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious PD-shape, please delete as F8 Bulwersator (talk) 18:30, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. --MGA73 (talk) 11:15, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Company Awards.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused file without description Bulwersator (talk) 18:33, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Baronnies (Col de Perty).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by MGA73 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:09, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I moved file to commons ([1]) but later I noticed larger version in history. Unfortunately I am unable to upload to commons full resolution (I am not sure why). So - can somebody try to finish move and delete as F8? Bulwersator (talk) 18:50, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded older version with http://toolserver.org/~magog/oldver.php and it worked fine for me... Wiki probably just had a bad day when you tried :-) --MGA73 (talk) 11:17, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WSFCS logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:13, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete fair-use image replaced by a higher quality version at File:Wsfcslogo.png DavidSSabb (talk) 19:58, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Passing admin, this is a db-self. Cheers, Sven Manguard Wha? 20:26, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tech N9ne and friends Music Video.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need a screenshot of the music video, these are living people not in costume, so we can use free images easily. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:25, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tennessee Tax Revolt logo, 2012.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This non-free image isn't used in the article space. Incubators in the Wikipedia namespace don't count (likely because most never make it out). Fails NFCC criteria 7 Sven Manguard Wha? 22:48, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment ‣ If that's the policy, it's fine with me. I have saved off the accompanying text and I can re-upload the file if the article is moved back into the main namespace. --▸∮truthious ᛔandersnatch◂ 01:36, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Seems more like {{pd-textlogo}} to me. The little triangle thing is a placeholder image from Microsoft Office. /ƒETCH COMMS / 19:05, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.