Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 March 31

< March 30	April 1 >

March 31

File:Ncaitna.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 00:01, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NEW-Photography-016.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned product image. Kelly ^hi! 00:09, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like commercial photographer, VERY likely copyright violation, and definition something that OTRS would be needed for. — raeky t 05:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Newexampleofclamping.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned penis picture. Kelly ^hi! 00:10, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nibblett's 1st Halloween 002small.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 00:13, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nickoladze.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 00:16, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nicole Caldwell.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 00:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also looks like a professional photograph, thus probably copyright violation, and something OTRS would be needed for. Was uploaded by same person who created a spam article about this person that was deleted. — raeky t 05:29, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

comment It's obvious that, once again, the nominator is not researching these pictures. This picture would be perfectly "encyclopedic" if one were writing a article on Nicole Caldwell. If one were to check that, though, one would find that the article in question was deleted as spam. Then an accurate characterization of this eminently deletable image could have been produced. Mangoe (talk) 12:59, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If the article was deleted as unencyclopedic, doesn't the same apply for the photo? Kelly ^hi! 13:29, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- No. "Unencyclopedic" means, even if we had an article on this person, we wouldn't want the photo. "Unencylopedic" means it's of horrific quality, making a funny face, a drunken facebook photo, etc. --B (talk) 16:10, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nicole-richie-dancing.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned attack image. Kelly ^hi! 00:17, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nizoral 2 percent.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned product image. Kelly ^hi! 00:21, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nmkjr132.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 00:22, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Normal ttape first time 12 6 06 002.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned penis picture. Kelly ^hi! 00:24, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nutrageous.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned product image. Kelly ^hi! 00:32, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lango Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo; the article was deleted. Dianna (talk) 01:50, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fullscreen capture 10162011 72225 PM.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary non-free image. The technical aspects of the production that are embodied in this shot are not discussed in the article, and the image is replaceable by either just text or a free mockup of what a Scrabble Lightning round gameboard might look like. Thus, the image fails WP:NFCC and should be deleted (as it has no suitable usage anywhere on WP). RJaguar3 | u | t 02:56, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LocationSerbia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: .Keep Dianna (talk) 13:21, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low quality, better replacements exist. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:43, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's used in a talk page archive. Do we normally delete images that are used on talk pages? It's potentially useful to someone reviewing the talk page archives and reading the old discussion. --B (talk) 12:47, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It's PD and in use in an archived discussion. — Bility (talk) 17:59, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Superpower3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, poor quality, unclear purpose. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:43, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CrudeEU27-3.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OR, LQ, unclear purpose. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:45, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Obama-lantern.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:03, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic. A carving of a pumpkin that is supposed to look like Barack Obama ... no forseeable encyclopedic use. B (talk) 14:51, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Orphaned, no stated purpose. — Bility (talk) 18:02, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OprahObamaDesMoines49.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:03, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, too low quality to be of use B (talk) 14:54, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Orphaned, no stated purpose. — Bility (talk) 18:03, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Image-Kinno-bhalwal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned watermarked image. Kelly ^hi! 15:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shubhangi atre poorey.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Discussion moved to Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 April 8#File:Shubhangi atre poorey.jpg. Dianna (talk) 13:27, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Kelly ^hi! 15:07, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there are multiple versions here. The uploader and the subject and the wikipedia article all share the same name. (are there also COI issues with their edits? ) -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 22:25, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This really should be done at WP:PUI. It's pretty obvious that the uploader is claiming to be this person. Whether they actually own the photos or they are owned by a studio or other entity is a separate and debatable question ... but we WANT notable people to contribute high quality photos of themselves, right? --B (talk) 12:51, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Added to PUF. — Bility (talk) 18:14, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:User-BillyTFried.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo. Kelly ^hi! 15:28, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Italianbeefwithcheese.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, poor quality. Kelly ^hi! 15:47, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Charles Brumskine 2010.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image, license is dubious. I clicked through the images uploaded by this contributor on the source website - http://digitaljournal.com/user/107957 - and I don't have a lot of confidence that the statement that this image is public domain can be taken at face value. They also tag [1], [2], and [3] as public domain, for instance. B (talk) 16:06, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I also don't have confidence in this user's tagging. For instance, there is a sports team logo marked as public domain in the digital journal album with source as Wikipedia. From his talk page history I see many of the images he's uploaded and/or modified have been deleted and he doesn't seem to engage in discussion about them, so it's unlikely we'll get a response to the license challenge. — Bility (talk) 18:34, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jellybean.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unencyclopedic. Kelly ^hi! 16:25, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the photoshopped face makes it unusable. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 22:19, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Doctor Who - The Bells of Saint John.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does not significantly contribute to the episode article. (a picture of a person talking to a telephone is easily described by text). MASEM (t) 19:51, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious delete. Also of course far too large. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Of all the possible visuals for this episode (most which wouldn't even fly), this adds the least. Glimmer721 ^talk 16:19, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Karl being Karl.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G3 by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned File, Unknown Subject, no use to keep Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:52, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.