Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 September 20

< September 19	September 21 >

September 20

File:06E 2014 5day.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map, no foreseeable use, WP:NOTWEBHOST. FASTILY 08:11, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lexa, from the series "The 100".jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This file was recently replaced by File:Lexa (The 100).jpg in the infobox at Lexa (The 100) and moved to another section. However, this seems an unnecessary use of non-free content so I orphaned the image and nominated it for deletion under WP:CSD#F5. It has now been restored by the editor who uploaded it, and the CSD tag was removed with the edit summary "Nope. Nominate it for deletion if you want it gone". AussieLegend (✉) 08:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The image was initially uploaded by me as the lead image. I recently changed the lead image and moved File:Lexa, from the series "The 100".jpg to the Casting and creation section of the article because it had a bit of information about the wardrobe of "Grounder" characters, which is what Lexa is, and I knew that I would be expanding the makeup and wardrobe material in that section. I went ahead and expanded the material after reverting AussieLegend. I included the image in the Casting and creation section per the number 5 listing at Wikipedia:Non-free content#Images. For more examples, see the Concept and creation section of the Jason Voorhees article and the Signature scar, hair and facial cues section of the Todd Manning article. After hours had passed, I decided that there should be a better image showcasing Lexa's wardrobe; so I uploaded File:Lexa wardrobe.jpg, and that is the image currently in the section. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 08:52, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It seems rather convenient that you've created a derivative work of this non-free content, apparently to get around its deletion. --AussieLegend (✉) 09:26, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded the file at 08:22, 20 September 2016, which is a minute before your initial post above. And it's clear that I had been working on the file before that upload. You can talk of convenient as much as you want to, but I know what I am doing (as I usually do on Wikipedia), and the previous file would not have been deleted under your rationale. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 09:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Packet of Walkers Salt & Vinegar crisps.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep ★ Bigr Tex 21:45, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

De Minimis query, over packaging artwork. I feel it's not obviously the subject of the image though. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:31, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The packaging is not the main subject of this photo, nor does it take up any considerable space in it. I feel that this is a pretty safe de minimis situation. — ξ ^xplicit 00:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.