Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 March 20

< March 19	March 21 >

March 20

File:United States Postal Service Logo.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: See Whpq's reply below -FASTILY 01:02, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. On this page Political appointments of Donald Trump some one is taking away United States Postal Service Logo and he thinks it's a copyright and if it is all the other logo's are a copyright also right? if this logo File:United States Postal Service Logo.svg is not a copyright can you please add it back on there and try to lock it in place so people don't try to delate it? Thanks so much Should it be added back yes or no? Someone please respon to my question? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.36.68.29 (talk) 23:55, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Someone please respon to my question? Thank you!

Your question was already answered at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#File:United States Postal Service Logo.svg 150px. If you don't understand, you shoud post your question to that thread. -- Whpq (talk) 19:29, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Buildings on the Kingston Harbour.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low-quality image. Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:YCO 17 Winners with Dr. Suborno Bose and Panel of Judges.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Claimed to be used for visual identification but is not used in the infobox where File:YCO-Logo.jpg takes that role. Whpq (talk) 12:38, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bhupesh baghel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious own work claim as similar to [1] — Train2104 (t • c) 13:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Courtney Allegra 2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The website says "creative commons 4.0" without further clarifying the type of licence. In addition, EXIF data claims Getty Images as the copyright holder. — Train2104 (t • c) 15:31, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The image is still available for licensing at Getty. We would need confirmation from Getty or the photographer that the copyright was transferred.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Courtney Allegra 3.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The website says "creative commons 4.0" without further clarifying the type of licence. In addition, EXIF data claims Getty Images as the copyright holder. — Train2104 (t • c) 15:32, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The image is still available for licensing at Getty. We would need confirmation from Getty or the photographer that the copyright was transferred. --Whpq (talk) 17:13, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lock icon blue.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file is apparently no longer used on MediaWiki:Common.css and can probably be deleted, seeing as an identical Commons file exists. Further, the file can be removed from WP:CASC Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:51, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not used to a great extent and fully-protected on Commons. Laurdecl ^talk 13:03, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Monobook-bullet.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file is apparently no longer used in the MediaWiki namespace and can probably be deleted, seeing as an identical Commons file exists. It should also be removed from WP:CASC Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant and a better quality version exists on Commons. Laurdecl ^talk 13:05, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Imbox featured.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file is not widely used and in non-critical pages. Also, the Commons file of the same name is fully protected. So the local copy probably is not necessary and neither the listing on WP:CASC Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:16, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the local copy seems to be barely used at all, unless I'm looking at it incorrectly. Laurdecl ^talk 13:20, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ambox move.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file is no longer widely used or used in sensitive locations, and the equivalent Commons file upload protected. We can probably do without the local copy and without the listing on WP:CASC Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:18, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this doesn't appear to be the standard move image, nor does it appear to be used much. Not sure why it's protected so much. Laurdecl ^talk 13:29, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ambox protection.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file does not seem to be widely used and the Commons file is fully protected. We can probably ditch the local copy and remove it from WP:CASC Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:23, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not used too much and fully-protected on Commons, though it appears to have been renamed. Laurdecl ^talk 13:19, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cmbox style.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file is no longer widely used and the Commons file is protected. Local file can probably be deleted and removed from WP:CASC Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:26, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; Commons file is fully-protected. Laurdecl ^talk 13:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cmbox move.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file is no longer widely used and the Commons file is protected. Local file can probably be deleted and removed from WP:CASC Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:27, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Full-protection on Commons is enough. Laurdecl ^talk 13:31, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ron Richards ASIO.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept, file is now tagged fair use -FASTILY 01:05, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In response to a CSD tag (removed) it was indicated this was cropped from - File:Vladimir Petrov and Evdokia Petrov with ASIO officer Ron Richards.jpg which was claimed to be out of copyright. This means the license on this image may be inccorect. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: After further investigation, I realized my intial instinct to use fair-use was justified. The original has a questionable license therefore the cropped requires a fair-use rationale.—አቤል ዳዊት^?(Janweh64) (talk) 05:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stefán Karl Stefánsson.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The subject is still alive, a free photo can be taken right now and uploaded to commons under a public domain license. editorEهեইдအ😎 23:36, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.