Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 January 12

< January 11	January 13 >

January 12

File:Inauguration crowd size comparison between Trump 2017 and Obama 2009.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:43, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:GETTY (WP:NFC#UUI#7). The right photo's copyright belongs to Getty Images and is not the subject of sourced critical commentary in the article. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:25, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GermanReeds1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:27, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unused locally, already on Commons (under a valid license), no reason to retain local copy FASTILY 07:21, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The copy at Commons does *not* have a valid license. It uses {{PD-old-100}}, but the date of the author's death is unknown, so that is not a valid license. Since the image is from 1881 and the image was a work for hire, I believe that there must be a valid license, but that is not it. Therefore, please do not delete the en.Wikipedia file until a valid license is added to the Commons file. -- Ssilvers (talk) 15:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed the license on Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 16:41, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That looks good. Fastily, I wish you would be more careful, before opening a Files for Discussion, that the Commons image is adequately licensed. If you don't know enough about licensing, you should not do it, because later someone will come along and delete the image from Commons, and it may be lost to the encyclopedia. -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:19, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Edie Kieft.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:25, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, missing verifiable source (i.e. unclear if file is actually PD as claimed) FASTILY 07:22, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Government Tartan.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:25, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 07:23, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PatriciaScotland2(cropped).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:25, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unused locally, already on Commons, no reason to retain local copy FASTILY 07:29, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 00:30, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IRIS hospital logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:26, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unused logo, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 07:31, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:30, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dr Press and J.A. Samaranch press photo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:26, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unused (personal?) image, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 07:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 00:30, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wmor dt2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:26, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unused logo, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 07:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Trams on George St, 1929.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 09:26, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 07:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HK ATV man 張煒 Sammy Cheung Wai 張樹輝 2013-10-09.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Photo is outdated and not fresh, one of the Chinese Wikipedian use this ugly image to shame him, and the Chinese real name is also mistaken (張樹棠 instead of 張樹輝), so please delete it. --202.130.100.151 (talk) 09:56, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Estate name sign Falkenrecks Heide municipality Gütersloh.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader has selected that this is licenced as software documentation but the file title suggests it is a photo of a sign. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:24, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Page from the visionary book of Maurits v. Falkenreck, in which he predicts the dismantling of the existing Political Ecosystem.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:30, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work; no indication that work has been donated Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:27, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2008 Baltimore Ravens Training Camp.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:31, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image is purported to be used to represent the Baltimore Ravens' 2008 season; however, it is only the logo of the team's training camp prior to the start of that season, which makes its use as an identifying logo for the 2008 Baltimore Ravens season article inappropriate, and thus its Fair Use rationale is invalid. – Pee Jay 19:38, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pancheros Banner.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

replaced with SVG Ylevental (talk) 22:43, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Autism Speaks Logo Updated.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: PNG files are preferred for graphics/logos whereas JPG is better for photographs. Some more technical details on PNG vs JPG -FASTILY 03:36, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a jpg file, found better png file at File:Autism Speaks Logo.png Ylevental (talk) 22:52, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Verification required on file extension. Is the general rule that jpg is better than png? If so then the png image should be the one deleted. 2001:8003:58A3:6C01:ADD5:E5F2:2AEC:FE4E (talk) 01:33, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.