Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 October 12

< October 11	October 13 >

October 12

File:Oxford Properties Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:03, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned; superseded by File:Oxford logo Standalone Twilight.svg. – Pbrks ^{(t • c)} 02:40, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to SVG file. Salavat (talk) 14:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PACE Sports Management logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:02, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned; superseded by File:PACE Sports Management logo.png – Pbrks ^{(t • c)} 03:24, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom, but no need for this, I've G7ed it. --Muhandes (talk) 06:53, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Belle Gunness with children.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image is missing author and source. Copy on Commons was deleted due to missing licensing information. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:04, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Picture must have been taken prior to 1908, finding the original author is unlikely as it is a family portrait. A cropped version exist [1] on commons with info. Link to source of picture there is dead. Nidarista (talk) 23:35, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I found an archived version in Norwegian. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:22, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If it's a family photo, there's a fair chance that it wasn't published until recently. {{PD-US-unpublished}} says that the copyright expires 120 years after the photo was taken if not published by 2003. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:05, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bapu sign1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No indication whose signature this is. Low quality and not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 22:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 14:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Images at Somewhere Down the Crazy River

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Procedural close, not actionable. Assuming an WP:NFCC#3a violation exists, it's not clear from the nomination statement which one should be deleted. If this is purely a discussion about which image would better represent the article's subject in the infobox, then this is an editorial matter which should first be discussed on the talk page of the affected article(s). -FASTILY 02:15, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I recently replaced the JPEG version of a side-A label of the Canadian vinyl release of Somewhere Down the Crazy River with the PNG one. Then, to please everyone, including cover art enthusiasts, I uploaded the picture sleeve that was used in many, if not most, non-Canadian releases. I've been worried about whether using both images comply with WP:NFCC#3a. If it doesn't, then I guess one of them shall be kept.

The song was written and sung by Canadian musician Robbie Robertson but didn't perform well in Canadian charts. It performed better in Belgium, the Netherlands, New Zealand, and the UK. It was also listed in one US rock chart. I figured that the Canadian vinyl would represent him, the song, and the Canadians well. However, I've not yet seen a Canadian single release use any picture sleeve but rather generic instead. If a cover art can represent the song better, then let's use the cover art. However, I also want the song to be more well represented by a release distributed to its home country. I'm still torn. George Ho (talk) 22:07, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Friedrich Leibacher.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2021 December 8. FASTILY 05:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friedrich Leibacher.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Raj Kapoor signature.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused "not fully free" image. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:01, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Satyamev Jayate Show Logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

India as a similar threshold of originality as the United States. However, the 3D effects likely put this logo above the ToO in the U.S. as well. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ihonestlyloveyou.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded the Australian single and then the UK single as intended replacements for this Yugoslavian picture sleeve, which I'm nominating here. Since WP:NFCC#3a applies, I would like either Australian and/or UK singles to take over and have the Yugoslavian release deleted instead. The song was sung by British-Australian singer Olivia Newton-John. George Ho (talk) 23:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources: 45cat and discogs. George Ho (talk) 23:58, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:I Love You, I Honestly Love You by Olivia Newton-John Australian single.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Converted to {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} -FASTILY 02:15, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this Australian single release to replace the Yugoslavian one. It's tagged as non-free, so I wonder whether the logo of "Interfusion" is eligible for US copyright. If so, does it meet WP:NFCC? Furthermore, I also uploaded the UK single as free to use in Commons. George Ho (talk) 23:58, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Almost forgot: Threshold of originality is very low in Australia. It may be copyrightable in Australia per c:COM:TOO Australia. George Ho (talk) 23:59, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.