Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 October 29

< October 28	October 30 >

October 29

File:Contract Signing of Madam Inutz with Wilbert Tolentino.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Procedural close. Copy only available on Commons; nominated there for deletion. Wrong venue. (non-admin closure) --George Ho (talk) 00:47, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC, copyright violation. Claimed as own work, but clearly taken straight from the artist's social media – the photo can be seen here on her Facebook account, for example.[1] Richard3120 (talk) 00:20, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Daisy Lopez aka Madam Inutz in Safari attire.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Procedural close. Copy only available on Commons; nominated there for deletion. Wrong venue. (non-admin closure) --George Ho (talk) 00:47, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC, copyright violation. Uploader claims photo as his own work, but the photo is taken straight from the artist's social media [2], and the actual photographer's name can be seen in the bottom left. Richard3120 (talk) 00:26, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coldplay - Fix You.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus. ✗plicit 07:21, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The sample was de-PRODded under assumption that it may be supported by critical commentary and comply with WP:NFCC#8. Re-reading Fix You#Arrangement, I'm unsure whether it does. The section describes briefly the song's structure and transitions. The sample contains one of the song's verses, yet the section doesn't mention it very much or at all. The section quotes one or two of the song's lines, but that's about it. Furthermore, an organ (or "a church-style organ" described by a caption) is assumed to be less understood without the sample. How would a reader not be able to understand what the article, including its "Arrangement" section, says without the sample? Furthermore, I wonder whether the sample complies with WP:FREER/WP:NFCC#1. George Ho (talk) 08:21, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is enough critical commentary in the article to pass WP:NFCC#8. Aspects (talk) 23:28, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Smiley Dude.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Smiley Dude.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 09:37, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 06:59, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Member of the CA State Board of Equalization, Fiona Ma (cropped).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused crop. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 09:41, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 07:00, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Light spectrum in nanometers.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 09:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 07:00, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mortimer Garth Club season 1935-36 team photograph.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright tag contains outdated information which hasn't applied since 1 July 1995. See File:UK non-Crown copyright flowchart.pdf for the correct current information. At the very least, the photograph was copyrighted in the United Kingdom on 1 January 1996, making it {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} in the United States. Current copyright status in the UK unknown. Stefan2 (talk) 09:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wesleykimler.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Given for press photo purposes for use on Wikipedia doesn't necessarily mean that it is in the public domain. Stefan2 (talk) 10:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NaziPunkMusic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused derivative work of CD covers. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:53, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:National Taiwan Ocean University logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Resolved -FASTILY 04:08, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan has a low threshold of originality. Logo is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:54, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, mislabelled non-free file so I have relicensed to non-free logo and added a fairuse. I updated the logo and added it to National Taiwan Ocean University. Salavat (talk) 07:10, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Navaneetham.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted newsletter, need evidence that uploader is the copyright holder as claimed. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:55, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nawazsharif.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a collection of screenshots from a news website, VRT permission is needed. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:56, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:11, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Neo-opsisCover7.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: If you are the copyright holder, please follow this procedure to get the file restored -FASTILY 04:08, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We need evidence that the uploader is the actual designer of this magazine cover. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 16:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "We need evidence that the uploader is the actual designer of this magazine cover." The description of issue 7 of Neo-opsis Science Fiction Magazine lists me (the uploader) as the artist for the image: http://www.neo-opsis.ca/Seven.htm, as does the Neo-opsis Covers page: http://www.neo-opsis.ca/Covers.htm (the cover is an animated version in this case). — Preceding unsigned comment added by KarlJohanson (talk • contribs) 17:22, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@KarlJohanson: One thing you can do is update the website to say that the magazine cover is under a Creative Commons license. This would eliminate the need for VRT correspondence. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:09, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But then Mr Johanson would lose or waive most of his rights to restrict commercial use if he chooses one of acceptable CC licenses, wouldn't he? Furthermore, would he permit use for either only Wikipedia or broader uses in(de)finitely? --George Ho (talk) 18:25, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Neudigital 01.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Likely above the threshold of originality. Source site is dead and not archived by the Wayback Machine, so there is no way to verify the license. Logo is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Neutron star cross section02.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a joke image. Gave me a good chuckle, but out of the project scope. Not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:06, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 07:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New Underwood.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photograph of copyrighted packaging and logo. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:07, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:14, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Newyorkpost.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of magazine, too recent to be in public domain. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:18, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Night Zero P08.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from a graphic novel, needs VRT permission. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:22, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 07:15, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Saints-(I'm) Stranded.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Currently used in (I'm) Stranded (song) and Punk rock. Unsure whether critical commentary is sufficient enough to help the sample meet WP:NFCC#8 in the song article and the genre article. Furthermore, five other samples remain in the genre article, leading to WP:NFCC#3a concerns. Moreover, the sample is ten or eleven seconds longer than what MOS:SAMPLE and WP:NFCC#3b limit/restrict, i.e. 10% of the song's length. George Ho (talk) 23:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Germs Forming.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Currently used in Forming (song) and Punk rock. Unsure whether critical commentary is sufficient enough to help the sample meet WP:NFCC#8 in the song article and the genre article. Furthermore, five other samples remain in the genre article, leading to WP:NFCC#3a concerns. George Ho (talk) 23:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.