Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 December 20

< December 19	December 21 >

December 20

File:Immaculate Reception.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Please see WP:NFC#UUI, point 7. ✗plicit 11:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image is an Associated Press photo. Although it depicts the topic of the article, the image itself is not the subject of significant sourced commentary and does not meet WP:NFCC#2. Whpq (talk) 00:25, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CorbieVreccan If this file cannot be uploaded then why can File:Manning tyree catch.jpg? What is the license that uses? Pennsylvania2 (talk) 01:52, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes the answer is simply that the other stuff also shouldn't be on Wikipedia, which is the case with the file you refer to. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 06:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DittoNewJeans.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. This file is in use and the other is marked as orphaned. ✗plicit 11:20, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a smaller version of the non-free File:NewJeans - Ditto.png. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 06:16, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Distribution of Spotted Nightjar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This map was licensed as being ineligible for copyright as "simple geometry", but I would consider the mapping decisions to involve sufficient creativity to push this beyond the threshold of originality even in the US. It is certainly above the very low threshold for Australia and since it could be redrawn independently I see no good case to be made for fair use. Felix QW (talk) 16:50, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mashkita.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Permission to use the image on Wikipedia is not the same as a free license. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:18, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FETchemical.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of table. Could be rendered with wiki markup if necessary. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki to Comomons, where this table would be within project scope as educational. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 01:59, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As a note, these images are often deleted Commons as well. c:Template:ShouldBeText recommends that such images be nominated for deletion once they have been replaced. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:03, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Huh. Today I learned. In that case, delete. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 15:28, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fidelis teachers1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Description says the individual images are "[t]aken from various class photographs." Permission from the original photographer(s) is needed. Image is not in use. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 00:02, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.