Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 June 15

< June 14	June 16 >

June 15

File:Jupiter Island Estate.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:10, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful own work per uploader's talk. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The uploader's history of copyright violations doesn't provide a lot of confidence that the claim of own work is true. The image was uploaded in 2011, but I found a video on Youtube from 2009 that uses the same image when showing off Celine Dion's home. See 1:51 mark of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqhbaJWh9iE fort he frame -- Whpq (talk) 02:34, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 15:04, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Archbishop Ohrid mantle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The source of the file is vague ("Source - National Historical Museum of Bulgaria."), and I found nothing about this allegedly historical drawing on the museum's website.
This unknown website reuses this image and its description verbatim, and gives a reference. However, said reference (I managed to find a scan only here) does not contain the image.
It is possible the image is an original, recent, copyrighted image, in the style of old paintings.
The image is currently unused.
Therefore, I think this image should be deleted. Veverve (talk) 08:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The description of the image above on the unknown website is in fact the book: Macedonia: documents and materials, published by the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences in 1978. A fragment of the restored mantel can be seen in this publication in the tabloid 24 Chasa, dedicated to the secret fund of the National Historical Museum. It falls into it, and thus is exposed very rarely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jingiby (talk • contribs)

@Jingiby: Thank you for your input and details.

Since you are its original uploader, is there any chance you remember where exactly you took this image from, years ago? Is it from Macedonia: documents and materials, or is the "unknown website" reusing the very image you uploaded?

Is there a way you could upload a higher resolution version of the image? Frankly, I have no idea what's represented apart from 5 angels; if you told me it was a scene of the Resurrection of Jesus I would not be able to say it is not. To me, due to this, the image in any case is not very useful. Veverve (talk) 20:07, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Veverve. As far as I remember it was uploaded from the "unknown site". I have not looked for an image of the shroud with a better resolution and I don't know whether I can find such one. Otherwise, I don't have an idea which religious scene is depicted there. Jingiby (talk) 05:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mygrandfather1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading or false image (possibly fictional, name of the modern artist visible [1]) - Self published eulogy in a magazine. Prominent newspaper in Kerala refused to publish the unverified image here [2] (by the same author) - Mahmoodeu (talk) 11:35, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Source says [3] "unearthed a rare and perhaps the only photograph of Vakkom Moulavi" - the image uploaded is a painting, not a photograph!

Mahmoodeu (talk) 11:48, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Virenque fan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The poster likely isn't de minimis. Image is not used anywhere. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 02:12, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.