Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 September 29

September 29

File:Massey equipment rental woodbridge 1870.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Pppery (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image was tagged for deletion has having not source. The naming and information does provide an approximate date of 1870. I propose this be relicensed as {{PD-old-assumed}}. Whpq (talk) 02:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~:I always thought that PD-old-assumed was only for works not first published in the US, and I would simply have opted a {{PD-US-expired}} tag. Felix QW (talk) 15:14, 30 September 2023 (UTC)~~[reply]

The photo was taken in Woodbridge, Ontario, Canada according to the file information. -- Whpq (talk) 15:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, sorry to have missed that. Struck out my comment, Felix QW (talk) 19:15, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian photographs created before 1949 are public domain in Canada, and this would also be public domain in the US. Could be moved to Commons. Abzeronow (talk) 19:13, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no source and unused. Been doing some digging and I can't find a single verifiable/reliable source that describes this image and its provenance. Would be curious to hear from the uploader, but it looks like they're long gone. -FASTILY 10:14, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as orphaned. No need to try to determine if it is copyrighted if the image is not in use anywhere. House Blaster^talk 23:55, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Muqan Qaghan in a Chinese television reenactment.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Whpq (talk) 16:16, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A historical figure who lived 1,500 years ago is illustrated with a proprietary image from the film. It could just as easily be a photo of any other lightly made-up Asian man or a drawing (WP:NFCC#1). — Ирука¹³ 11:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The image being a proprietary TV reenactment is not replaceable as such. It is important in showing how modern media depicts this historical ruler. पाटलिपुत्र (Pataliputra) (talk) 05:07, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article doesn't say anything about this. It's not important. — Ирука¹³ 05:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Does not meet WP:NFCC#1 or WP:NFCC#8 as currently used. Upon reviewing the text of the article, I found no substantial sourced critical commentary/coverage. -FASTILY 10:15, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hon Jacinta Allan MP.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The website with copyright info provided ([1]) states: All material provided on this website is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence, except– any images or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms and the Victorian Government logo content supplied by third parties. ––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 13:07, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pi'erre Bourne - The Life of Pi'erre 4.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no way that this is fair use. I get that this is an album cover but the image literally only consists of a purple square with literally nothing else on it, which to me is obviously not original. Do you guys agree with this? DaCrashy (talk) 22:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.