Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Spib

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ✗plicit 14:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Spib

No idea what this is for. SPI's are archived by moving them to a subpage, not the top and bottom way used by normal discussions. found only one link to this page. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 09:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Serves no purpose. Air on White (talk) 09:44, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. –Konanen (talk) 11:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The originator was an SPI clerk, so it may have been previously used for archiving. However, Wikipedia:Spit is something else unrelated. The originator has not edited in nine years. The nominator has found that it isn't used. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:12, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Unused page. – Primium (talk) 01:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete creator has been inactive since 2015. Catfurball (talk) 15:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete per above. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:14, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as G1 or G2. It even makes no sense. The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Sockpuppet investigations ^[which?]. If these don't apply, delete. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 00:12, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Bduke (talk) 05:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.