Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 February 8

< February 7	February 9 >

February 8

File:PAF--Bombay.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:PAF--Bombay.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Changed from speedy F9. quoting http://www.iitb.ac.in/archive/paf/Bombay.jpg on http://www.iitb.ac.in/archive/paf/paf.htm. It's been here so long, that a couple of days for uploader to comment won't hurt - they might be able to license via OTRS. Also found in web archive at http://web.archive.org/web/20051015001019/http://www.iitb.ac.in/archive/paf/paf.htm - so web page does seem to pre-date the Wiki upload date. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jamcilhenny2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 22:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jamcilhenny2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

It says that this is in the public domain because it was published before 1923, but there is no evidence of publication. Stefan2 (talk) 01:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I found an online source that predates the upload, and converted the image to Fair Use. -- Dianna (talk) 22:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Charlton Heston, Ben-Hur.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Wizardman (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charlton Heston, Ben-Hur.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

Contravenes WP:NFCC#1. A free equivalent of this image is available from the pre-1978 theatrical trailer and available at the Commons (see File:Charlton Heston in Ben Hur trailer.jpg). Since a free image is available, a fair use argument for this image is invalid. Betty Logan (talk) 06:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did tag the image with the dfu template, but the uploader removed it without explaining why the FUR is valid while a free alternative exists on the commons. Simply filling in the NFCC#1 field as "not applicable" doesn't really cut it. Betty Logan (talk) 07:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page is for images which are claimed to be free but which might not be free. In this case, you are requesting deletion of an image which isn't claimed to be free, so WP:FFD is a better place if you don't wish to fight with an editor who's removing tags. In this case, though, I wondering if this simply isn't the same photo as the one on Commons with just a few simple modifications in an image editor. --Stefan2 (talk) 09:45, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Palmzire71picture.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Dianna (talk) 22:39, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palmzire71picture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Looks like a snapshot of a painting, the copyrights of which are unclear. Thus making this a possible copyvio. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's my actual picture of a frozen over pond then thawing, slowly, hence all the dew. Not a painting. Totally free to use. Baseballfan (talk) 05:50, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PrincessAndICast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:PrincessAndICast.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photograph of printed work? Eeekster (talk) 07:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:SCQReloadOKAkoCast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SCQReloadOKAkoCast.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Poor photography of printed work? Eeekster (talk) 07:58, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:OriginalAngTVCast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:OriginalAngTVCast.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Poor photography of printed work? Eeekster (talk) 07:58, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:StarMagicTalents15.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:StarMagicTalents15.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be a photograph of a TV screen. Eeekster (talk) 07:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ShoutoutCast3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ShoutoutCast3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be a photograph of a TV screen. Eeekster (talk) 07:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:UnderageCast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:UnderageCast.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be a photograph of a TV screen. Eeekster (talk) 07:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:StarMagicTalents8.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:StarMagicTalents8.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be a photograph of a TV screen. Eeekster (talk) 08:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:StarMagicTalents7.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:StarMagicTalents7.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be a photograph of a TV screen. Eeekster (talk) 08:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:StarMagicTalents4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:StarMagicTalents4.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be a photograph of a TV screen. Eeekster (talk) 08:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:AbtUrLuvUrLyf2Cast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:AbtUrLuvUrLyf2Cast.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be a photograph of a TV screen. Eeekster (talk) 08:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ABSCBNLUVUCast2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABSCBNLUVUCast2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be a photograph of a TV screen. Eeekster (talk) 08:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:KieferMamba15.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:KieferMamba15.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Photo of a magazine cover. Eeekster (talk) 08:05, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:KieferOnSportsDigest.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:KieferOnSportsDigest.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Magazine cover. Eeekster (talk) 08:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Coat of Arms of NU "OLA".jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair-use rationale. Dianna (talk) 01:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of Arms of NU "OLA".jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This must belong to the institution and not the uploader as claimed. Eeekster (talk) 08:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
See also Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Герб НУ "ОЮА".jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MyOnlyHopeCast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:MyOnlyHopeCast.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image of TV screen. Eeekster (talk) 08:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:PJ Javier at office.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:PJ Javier at office.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The source of "I caught it on a campaign calendar" implies this isn't the work of the uploader and is a copyright violation. Eeekster (talk) 08:17, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ABSCBNLUVUCast3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABSCBNLUVUCast3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be a photograph of a TV screen. Eeekster (talk) 08:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:StarMagicTalents9.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:StarMagicTalents9.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be a photograph of a TV screen. Eeekster (talk) 08:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:StarMagicTalents5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:StarMagicTalents5.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be a photograph of a TV screen. Eeekster (talk) 08:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:OriginalGoinBulilitCast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:OriginalGoinBulilitCast.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Appears to be a photograph of a TV screen. Eeekster (talk) 08:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pandoras roxy.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pandoras roxy.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image says "PHOTO BY DAVE WALLIN-EDDY" and is uploaded by Soundvisions. Not sure if they are same and who the copyrights holder is. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:50, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:TedHamm.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep one file, delete the copy vio one from http://stjoesreport.org/about/. -- Dianna (talk) 22:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:TedHamm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

There are two different images under this file name. One of the files is a copyright violation: http://stjoesreport.org/about/

The other image looks OK and can be kept. Stefan2 (talk) 10:19, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Langcaster Stratocaster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep - there is an OTRS permission tag --B (talk) 11:44, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Langcaster Stratocaster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

I find numerous low-resolution copies of this everywhere on the Internet. Stefan2 (talk) 12:00, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Langcaster 12 Pole Pickups.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Per [1], File:Langcaster Pickups.jpg kept, File:Langcaster 12 Pole Pickups.jpg deleted. --B (talk) 13:43, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Langcaster 12 Pole Pickups.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

File:Langcaster Pickups.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

There are low-resolution copies of this elsewhere on the Internet: http://www.vintageandrare.com/uploads/products/24603/120904/Langcaster-Low-impedance-100-2012-big.jpg?1360325000 Stefan2 (talk) 12:01, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Langcaster Pickups.jpg has an OTRS tag. I have asked at Commons:COM:OTRS/Noticeboard for someone to (1) verify that the permission is legitimate and (2) check to see if the permission also applies to File:Langcaster 12 Pole Pickups.jpg. --B (talk) 11:50, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:El Chapo-Guzman-1.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:El Chapo-Guzman-1.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The file information page tells that the photo was taken by an employee of the US government as part of the employee's official services as an employee of the US government. However, the source tells that the person is a fugitive and that the US government doesn't seem to know where the man is, except that his latest known address was in Mexico. If the US government doesn't know where the man is, then I don't see how the US government can take photos of him. The government probably got the photo from somewhere else. Stefan2 (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The information page doesn't say any of the sort. What it says is "This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States Federal Government under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code." The requirement is that it be a work of the US Government, and shooting photos is not the ONLY work of the US Government, as the nominator's claim obviously assumes. The photo is on that government website --and it is there as PD-- because it is the result of work performed by the US Federal Government. As such, the copyright status indicated, PD, is correct and the image should stay. No offense, but the nominator appears to have a very blindsided view of what "work by" really means. If "work by" only means "shooting a picture", then the nominator hasn't made his case and needs to include a reference to such legal definition in his nomination/allegation. My name is Mercy11 (talk) 06:40, 9 February 2013 (UTC), and I approve this message.[reply]

Sorry but the US government does not possess the power to change a non-PD image into a PD one just because they use it, the rest of the poster may be PD but the picture on it, if taken from another source is not. LightGreenApple _{talk to me} 06:52, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Uhggg??? Sorry but, who's talking about the US government possessing any PD-changing powers? Also, are you in the right forum??--->Who's talking about any "posters" here??? My name is Mercy11 (talk) 04:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC), and I approve this message.[reply]

I was speaking in the metaphorical sense of the website being a later day version of a wild west wanted poster; if as is likely the US government took the image from another source, put it on something they created, then that does not make the picture a PD one. LightGreenApple _{talk to me} 04:34, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let's stay on the subject at hand and not diverge into irrelevant Wild West stories. The undisputed fact here is that the photo is from the DEA website, an agency of the US Dept of Justice, a federal government organization whose entire website contents are PD. Their exception to this, it states HERE, are four works that are in effect copyrighted. However, none of those four works are this photo. As such the photo is PD. My name is Mercy11 (talk) 06:06, 16 February 2013 (UTC), and I approve this message.[reply]

There is only one thing which is relevant here: Either it was taken by a US government employee as part of his employment, or it wasn't taken by a US government employee as part of his employment. Only in the first case is the image free to use. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The use by the US Government on a poster does not automatically turn a non-PD picture into a PD one. So unless it can be shown that the US government created the picture (as opposed to re-used an existing one created by a non-US government source) then it is incorrectly licensed and should be deleted as replaceable by a free one. LightGreenApple _{talk to me} 06:52, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you seem to be in the wrong forum: no one here has even mentioned the word "poster", as you are. But assumming you meant "photo" instead of "poster", you are still stating that "the use by the US Government [of a photo] does not automatically turn a non-PD picture into a PD one". However, for you statement to be true, you first have to assume as fact that the photo was non-PD when the Feds first used it to begin with. Question: Where is your proof to the fact that when the Feds first used the photo it was already non-PD? Yours is an example of circular reasoning - a fallacy. As such the argument you are presenting is, well, purely argumentative in nature and fails to prove or disprove anything. My name is Mercy11 (talk) 06:06, 16 February 2013 (UTC), and I approve this message.[reply]

It is the other way around: It is up to the one wishing to keep the image to prove that the image is in the public domain. The one wishing to delete the image doesn't need to prove anything. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MakatiCity.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Dianna (talk) 22:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:MakatiCity.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Possibly unfree image. The user has recently updated images claiming them as self made but a Google search says otherwise. Elockid ^(Talk) 22:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's from Skyscraper City: http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=100456166 -- Dianna (talk) 22:49, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Shahbagprotest.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shahbagprotest.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

The licence is invalid, no evidence provided that this is a PD image. LightGreenApple _{talk to me} 23:50, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.