Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/L07ChLeo3

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that unsuccessful. Please do not modify it.

L07ChLeo3

Nomination

Final (0/6/0); Apparently withdrawn by candidate and as such closed at 00:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC). Regards So Why 00:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

L07ChLeo3 (talk · contribs) – Hello I am L07ChLeo3 and I would like to request to become an administrator. Over my time as a contributor to the English Wikipedia I have tried my best to work for and aid the project extensively therefore I would like to request adminship to continue work in an easier and more professional way and to prevent vandalism in any shape or form. I am also an administrator on a Wikia and a bureaucrat on my own Wikia which I have founded myself. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 21:39, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: ~~I accept my self nomination~~. L07ChLeo3 (talk) 21:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A: Preventing Vandalism and resolving disputes

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: My best contributions are that to transport articles such as to Harringay railway station and Crouch Hill railway station where I have actually visited the place and taken pictures and found out about it. I am also the main contributor to these articles

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A: I haven't been in a conflict but if I had been in one I would try to resolve it in a calm manner following all guidelines and if it still could not be resolved then I would call in a sysop or even further request for arbiration.

General comments

Links for L07ChLeo3: L07ChLeo3 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
Edit summary usage for L07ChLeo3 can be found here.

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/L07ChLeo3 before commenting.

Discussion

Support

Oppose

Not now: I'm sorry but I can't find any experience with administrative function/duties. Additionally, you say you want to work in dispute resolution, but that's an area non-admins can get involved in. Lots of good edits to transport related articles, though, but nothing from which to judge whether you'd be a good admin or not. - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 21:55, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not now Per Jarry1250. -down load | sign! 22:03, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Moral support A little more than 1,000 edits, more edits to your userpage than to articles. Moral support per WP:NOTNOW.--Giants27 ^T/C 22:10, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOTNOW contains some great links and should not be avoided as a reference page in RFA discussion such as this. I'm sorry but the broken English in the answers to the standard questions is concerning, your Q1 indicates nothing that you can't do already and you have little expereince in the maintenance areas of this work. Your hard efforts so far are, of course, appreciated so please don't take the likely negative outcome of this RFA as anything but a request to keep on with your good work. Pedro : Chat 22:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also, from your user page - "My aim is to become an administrator of Wikipedia. " - that's not really a good "aim" to be honest. Pedro : Chat 22:21, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:NOTNOW fr33k man -s- 22:26, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above - try again perhaps in a few months and more experience. Sorry - Fastily (talk) 22:52, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.