Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Xx Cool Guy7202 xX
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Final (0/3/0); ended 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW — MusikAnimal talk 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Nomination
[edit]Xx Cool Guy7202 xX (talk · contribs) – Is helpful and an administrator on many other wikis has a PhD and is very good at reverting vandalism, thank you for reviewing. Xx C00l G$Y x#t@lk 06:23, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Questions for the candidate
[edit]Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A:Reverting vandalism.
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A:Housekeeping tasks because I like to keep everything running smooth.
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A:No users have ever really caused me any stress but if they are breaking policies I report them to an admin for review.
You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.
Discussion
[edit]- Links for Xx Cool Guy7202 xX: Xx Cool Guy7202 xX (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for Xx Cool Guy7202 xX can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
Support
[edit]Oppose
[edit]- Oppose The editor's account is 11 days old. I don't like throwing around the WP:NOTNOW qualification, but this is way, way, WAY too soon for adminship. 155 edits, with almost 3/4s in User or User Talk space. It's admirable, but please work on articles, learn more about how Wikipedia works, participate constructively in discussions, such as AfD, and come back again with more experience under your belt. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:56, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - much too early. Request WP:SNOW close. --Ches (talk) (contribs) 16:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose, is it too early to call for a WP:SNOW on this? No way would I want an administrator with only 11 days worth of editing on the books. I cannot express my disdain for this enough. Learn the ropes and come back when you've got a few years' worth of solid editing, AfD support, and much more experience. - SanAnMan (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Neutral
[edit]General comments
[edit]- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.