Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Deathrocker

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Deathrocker}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


Deathrocker

[edit]
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Code B Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Deathrocker#Log of blocks and bans

Per discussion with Yamla, who normally does the sock whacking. Being a party to the relevant AC case, I know both editors' MO, and it fits him. Will (talk) 15:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Deathrocker

[edit]

Code B Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Deathrocker#Log of blocks and bans

Currently there is a pissing contest at List of gothic metal bands (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) between Leyasu (editing as an IP), Fred138 (an accused Leyasu sock) and Fair Deal (an accused Deathrocker sock). Since I've requested a check on Fred, I suppose its only Fair to check Deathrocker and Fair Deal as well, so we can tell once and for all what's really going on here and levy the appropriate responses. Thatcher131 11:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Red X Unrelated, however Fair Deal appears to be related to Anger22 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). The Uninvited Co., Inc. 18:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deathrocker

[edit]

Deathrocker is suspected of using socks to violate core policys on the Children of Bodom article [1]. Deathrocker has a known history of using sockpuppets, his most recent one month block for using the sock puppet Comment to disrupt and vandalise the ANI board. Other cases have been shown including the bragging of using anons to vandalise UserPages of Admins and Users that have blocked or been in content disputes with him.

Deathrocker is also currently held in a arbirrition case [2], his second arbirrition case for the harrassment of users using socks and vandalism. The user has been noted by admins Idont, Tony and Sceptre as baiting me [3], and has been warned by sceptre for Incivilty and Personal Attacks [4].

Deathrocker has also used the anons in several instances of Wikilawyering on the ArbCom case. The first instance was to have the case annulled, when this failed, he tried to have Sceptre's admin powers revoked, and when this failed, attempted to have me banned from Wikipedia so that my statement doesnt count.

We request this check user to see if Deathrocker is using the anons to bait people into violating paroles and policys and to violate core policys himself, and if he is, so this can recorded as evidence in his Arbirrition Case. If he isnt, then the user can be dealt with seperatly with no recourse upon Deathrocker. Ley Shade 02:26, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neither the anons nor Mike are me. This user is the only person who has suspect that I'm any of these people... Leyasu violated his ArbCom parole, claiming one of the anons first post was "vandalism" and threatened him or her [5]

Leyasu has recently been warned about Labeling good faith edits as "vandalism" yet he continued to do so in relation to this noob, I'd take this users words with a pinch of salt, they have a history of causing trouble on Wikipedia [6] shows the user has 6 violations of ArbCom parole.

Recently this user was found guilty of using several sockpuppets to edit articles while blocked. user:Idont_Havaname, user:Deiz and Tony and others are here discussing Leyasu's use of sockpuppets [7] which were used to attack users and revert articles while Leyasu was banned. [8]

Check the history of the anons, non of them edit the ArbCom case against myself, this is a deception by Leyasu (who is well known for that). Leyasu is commiting Slander on this very page, my ArbCom case is because I reported a sock that had a similar IP to ones already found to be Leyasu. I'm not there because of "harassment", "using socks" and "vandalism"... here are clear personal attacks by Leyasu, claiming that I'm a "vandal"... this is slander, this is against the law and Wikipedia policies.

I will however, notify this Mike guy about this latest attack by Leyasu, and see if we can get him here for comment.

(Note - the DeathrockerComment account was not a "sock" an admin allowed me to use it over a month ago, after a comment was needed on a case, check the archives I do not have a "history of using socks".. though Leyasu has been found guilty of using of using numerous socks before [9]) - Deathrocker 07:36, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(Note - Mike5193 is not a sock. I am Michael Lyons, and I dont know who the the other guy is. Leyasu is confused or something. Bye bye — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike5193 (talk • contribs)

 Inconclusive. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 06:27, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Deathrocker&oldid=1146608736"