Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Matthead

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Matthead}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Matthead

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch • talk
Filed: 11:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Matthead (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
194.9.5.10 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
194.9.5.12 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Code letter: F

This/These anonymous IP(s) showed up a few hours after Matthead (talk · contribs) was blocked. He/She has the same tone, modus operandi and seems to continue Mattheads discussion of Talk:Last battle of the battleship Bismarck. Could someone check if the IPs I provided are the same as User:Mattheads? Thanks. Rex 11:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additional information needed per B, could you provide a link to the discussion where Matthead was banned by the ArbCom? -- lucasbfr ^talk 12:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: changing the case letter to G meanwhile. -- lucasbfr ^talk 12:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Banned by the Arbcom? Isn't B for evading blocks in general? Oh well, here is the diff in which he got blocked. Rex 13:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry for the wrong letter. It appears this should be under F.Rex 13:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible. Dmcdevit·t 15:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but what does possible mean in this case? Is it him or isn't it?Rex 17:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: moving discussion about that request to the talk page -- lucasbfr ^talk 15:44, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.