Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tomasthetankengine
Appearance
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 14:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC) |
- Tomasthetankengine (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Elvisandhismagicpelvis (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- B:
Elvisandhismagicpelvis is currently blocked from editing. Tomasthetankengine started making very similar edits today. I feel this is the same user avoiding a ban. Tancred 14:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: the ban has expired, but the new user has been created (IMO) to reset the warning process to a blank slate. Dibo T | C 23:51, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, the only sockpuppet here is user:Dibo. user:tancred's contributions have been very disruptive. --Tomasthetankengine 03:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- The old Dibo and Tancred are sockpuppets allegation - similar to user:Topcattheirrefutable's comments at Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Ehinger222 back in the day, as well as 147.10.112.157 and Caesar34.
- Just so happens that a RFCU was done some months ago and concluded that Tancred and I are unrelated. Dibo T | C 06:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, the only sockpuppet here is user:Dibo. user:tancred's contributions have been very disruptive. --Tomasthetankengine 03:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Likely. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 19:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- What a scandalous assertion. I could not possibly be all those guys. --Tomasthetankengine 03:26, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.