Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kipperfield

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kipperfield

Kipperfield (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kipperfield/Archive.

23 November 2024

[edit]

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Long-term mass changes of dates to UK style across many accounts and many months consistent with Kipperfield's MO. Requesting sleeper check due to the number of socks involved. It's quite possible I've missed a few! Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 08:16, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have listed these in (roughly) chronological order. Spring tides, Summer holidays, Autumn leaves, Winter warmers is the most recent. He is non-stale and can be checked! Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 10:22, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Spicy: Literally every edit made by every account is supporting evidence: [1][2][3]. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 11:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you need me to paste a diff from all 19 accounts?? Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 11:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the diff for the most recent account: [4] Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 11:08, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
  • Someone who's wrong on the internet:  Additional information needed. In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Spicy (talk) 10:27, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]