Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sapvdjksfsqd/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Sapvdjksfsqd

Sapvdjksfsqd (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
11 August 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

A whole bunch of accounts with gibberish usernames each created for the purpose of a few vandalistic edits to The Bugle. Requesting checkuser to find sleepers and possibly block the IP for a while. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:32, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Blocked one other account, placed a rangeblock. TNXMan 16:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

22 August 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


A continuation of the previous disruption, this time at Robin Ince. The range block has either expired or needs to be widened and a check for any sleepers would be appreciated (all of the above accounts were blocked by me prior to discovering this SPI page). Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 14:41, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Blocked a few more accounts, expanded rangeblock. TNXMan 16:35, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

02 November 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

A user is socking with increasingly long names, purely to vandalise the Robin Ince article. McGeddon (talk) 17:20, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
04 November 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Same gibberish name and vandalism targets. McGeddon (talk) 12:10, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

 Possible, bordering on  Likely. No other accounts, though. TNXMan 13:59, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Clerk note: account has been blocked and tagged. If this continues, someone may wish to file a request at RfPP. Closing. Best, SpitfireTally-ho! 21:19, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

18 November 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Ongoing "cow's udder" nonsense to British comedy articles. McGeddon (talk) 12:49, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

Decided to run a check since this user has history of creating multiple accounts. Didn't find any this time. But that listed IP is  Likely to be them. Elockid (Talk) 16:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

03 December 2011
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

More socking in the exact same style. McGeddon (talk) 16:32, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
02 March 2012
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Another mash-the-keyboard username here to add its "joke" to an article about a British comedian McGeddon (talk) 19:59, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

 Confirmed the following are the same:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sapvdjksfsqd/Archive&oldid=1079616774"