Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sky0000/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Sky0000

Sky0000 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
28 July 2014
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


I wish I knew that the relationship between these 2 users, edit the same way and always fall into edit wars; I must say that the editions of these two users are incorrect.

Here I will show some evidence:

The user Zaca4 think badly drafted list [1]. Which recently edited Sky0000. I would also say that the user Sky0000 was previously blocked by a month, and I think just blocking and returned by wrong issues.--Damián (talk) 10:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Note that there's been a bunch of activity on What Life Stole From Me by fluctuating IPs after this, and at least two SPAs have showed up just to make minor changes as well:
Zaca4 suggests in this edit that they don't know Sky0000, but here they admit that they "may have the same IP". If not sockpuppetry, definitely meatpuppetry. 0x0077BE [talk/contrib] 13:06, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
03 August 2014
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Hello, I think the user Sky0000 is evading blocking 3 months with your new account Zeta54.

So I ask you to check both accounts. Damián (talk) 20:15, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also add the IP 217.71.46.224, who is apparently using the user to impose their edciones [2].--Damián (talk) 20:29, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

 Clerk note: In addition to being obvious, the user admits being a puppet. I've indeffed and tagged the new account. I've increased the block of the master to indefinite and tagged him. I'm taking no action against the IP who has edited only once.--Bbb23 (talk) 08:35, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

19 August 2014
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Hello, I would like to know that relationship between both users, This account was recently created and edited in the same way as Sky0000, adding irrelevant information, as an example; you here, Both users do this same kind of issues, and fall into edit wars. Like Sky0000, this does the same as he, addressing my discussion to ask explanations, being a new user. Just to confirm without both users are the same person or not. Since your issues are very similar.--Damián (talk) 06:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
30 August 2014
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Hello, you Xaxi32 has the same pattern Sky0000 editions. Just now made an issue, in the article "El color de la pasión", Edition that I reversed and then reversed me. Then I left a message on my talk. This did the August 19, 2014, with his last account confirmed. Recently, this new user accounts were also confirmed. The accounts are Dasi34 and Haca5. If there is any relationship between Xaxi32 and Sky0000. also let me know if more puppets created. Damián / talk 14:14, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]

 Clerk endorsed. I've indeffed Xaxi32 as obvious and because it is actively disruptive, but I added the other two accounts to the list and would like confirmation of all. The reason for Damian naming Haca5 eludes me as they've made no edits (username issue?).--Bbb23 (talk) 15:44, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I should have followed that link Damian gave, but sometimes his writing confuses me, and then again I'm easily confused. Anyway, thanks for sorting it all out.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:00, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
06 September 2014
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets


Hello, obviously Sky0000 is back with a new account. Now he has made ​​another complaint here. If no relation between users, please would like to know if you have created more accounts. It is evident that this user is not going to stop. Damián (talk) 17:06, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]


09 September 2014
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

His editions editions are only for reversing, also published in the same way Sky0000 edits. Damián (talk) 14:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
09 September 2014
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

editing pattern. Creation of account just after previous sock blocked Nthep (talk) 16:16, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This user is not going to stop, has already declared war. This also tells me on my talk. You can not do something or do?, locking range of ips?.--Damián (talk) 17:29, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
26 September 2014
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

I wonder what relationship they have mentioned the IP and the user. Since the user is trying to defend the ip; here. The IP has been edit wars in the article "Tierra de Reyes". To find out for sure and do not blame others, but I think the Rero234 account is a new puppet Sky0000. Damián (talk) 19:23, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
06 November 2014
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

Hello, I would like to know what relationship is there between these users. Since 2 accounts edit the same way that made him Sky0000. And the ip is from Cacavaca. Cacavaca, has been adding unnecessary information in the article Quiero amarte [3]. Klap101 just added speculative information in several articles, which was also Sky0000 [4]. If you need more evidence, please ask them. You should also check if Sky0000 has not created more accounts. Since I've been seeing many new accounts, that know how to edit - and also edit from a mobile, but I have no certainty that are addressed from the same person.--McVeigh / talk 12:42, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
20 January 2015
[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets

His writing and how has initiated a long war of issues in the article Tierra de reyes, makes me think that this is a new puppet Sky0000. McVeigh / talk 20:13, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users
[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Here is the message left by the user. here another way in which reverted Sky0000. The article also added the same type of information.--McVeigh / talk 21:31, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Sky0000/Archive&oldid=1136432881"